Measuring gearing accurately.... the good oil on gearing!
By Rob Wessling
The Formula:
Number of pinion teeth X 3.141 X Tyre Diameter (mm) DIVIDED by Number of Spur teeth = MILLIMETRES PER REVOLUTION
I first came across this method of measuring overall gearing whilst competing in Remote Control Electric on-road racing back in the late 1980's. A fellow club member had been skilled and fortunate enough to attend the 1/12th scale World Championships in Singapore. He did well in the event and ended up being sponsored by one of the major American manufacturers of On-Road racing equipment. One of the first things he learnt from his new sponsor was this method of measuring gearing, something he freely shared (thankfully) with the rest of us racing at that time.
Fast forward a number of years, I find myself in a new (but similar) scale racing hobby, I realize this method of measuring overall gearing has relevance in the world of 1/32 scale slot cars.
Many of us use the traditional way of determining overall gearing, that being dividing the number of spur teeth by the number of pinion teeth to give a final drive ratio (eg. 27 spur divided by 9 tooth pinion equals a 3:1 final drive ratio). Whilst very easy to calculate, this method of calculating gearing does not take into account the size of tyre being used on a particular model (circumference).
Differences in overall tyre diameter can and do affect overall gearing. I will demonstrate this by doing the MMPR calculations for a number of 1/32 models that share 9:27 (3:1) final drive gearing.
Firstly the SCX Arrows Formula 1 model, its tyre diameter is 19.5mm:
9 X 3.141 X 19.5mm divided by 27 = 20.42 MMPR
Secondly the early Scalextric Ford Taurus Nascar, its tyre diameter is 20.9mm:
9 X 3.141 X 20.9 divided by 27 = 21.88 MMPR
Lastly (and perhaps most graphically) the Carrera Dodge Charger, its tyre diameter is 23.6mm:
9 X 3.141 X 23.6 divided by 27 = 24.71 MMPR
As seen above, cars with identical mechanical gearing can and do have often substantial variance when overall gearing is calculated by this method.
I have found this equation a useful tool for performance tuning in scale racing over the years, as I can accurately tailor a cars performance to a particular track (a 19-21 MMPR figure seems to be ideal for our home layout). A larger more open layout would suit a correspondingly higher MMPR value.
I can also compare a models gearing to the requirements of after-market motors that offer higher performance than stock items. A general rule of thumb I work by is the higher the RPM of a motor, the less gearing (lower MMPR figure) required (higher RPM range motors appear to work better for me with a lower MMPR value, eg. Motor heating is lessened with a lower MMPR). I have also found that motors that give higher torque measurements can tolerate increased MMPR values.
I hope this information assists other enthusiasts to enjoy our great hobby even more!