People will argue this one all the time. But on my track, at the milder speeds we are running, it does not make much difference compared to a straight chassis with a little Flintstone rib of lead on the left. Our last race with Mark was about as close as it gets and we had chassis in 3 different configurations.
But this is a new one, so I will test and report. Who knows? Maybe it will actually work :)
you need to send it up for the inspectors to check out, I think its a bit over, may take some time to check out metallurgy and and see if its been acid dipped :auto-checkeredflag:
That looks good .it would be a great setup for a hardbodied modified like a vega or a pinto type body .doesnt MT resin make a modified body . I might to try my first 1/32 chassis build in your foot steps with a pinto build. thanks for the idea Tony
Harry, my first impression is you built yourself a nice oval chassis. If I had needed one, that would have been my approach. Something similar ought to work with Kev's paper modifieds. It'll be interesting to read how it goes on a roadcourse track. :)
Looks good - someone pointed out the Stinker chassis was like a return to the early days of scratch building - before angle winders and bat-pans and thingies. I think that is a part of the charm of these builds.
bill from nh - We have been building the laminated nymodifieds based off of a straight Womp with a little offset - but someone could definitely take it up a notch and do a full offset scratch built chassis...