"If you are avoiding fees for a service it is stealing, sorry"
Wow - at what point did anyone say they were avoiding fees. It is PayPal choice to offer F&F service for free within the local country HOWEVER we are talking about International Transactions and commenting on the change in the fee structure for F&F International. So we are not avoiding anything.
"you may not ask the buyer to send you a PP " = not applicable because they didn't ask - plus I am not not talking about commercial transactions.
In the example I mentioned above I was sending money to a friend who is posting a car for me. That would = "Payment Owed: to pay your friend back for your share of a dinner bill, or other item that your friend paid for you." He paid the postage - I am sending him the money to cover that.
The conversation started as a note that PayPal has changed the fee structure for F&F International. There has always been a fee for sending F&F International. I choose to send money to someone I know F&F so I pay the fee rather than they pay the fee. My friend posting the car gets the 10 euro he paid back rather than 9.14 euro. I could (and did) work out the percentage and added the fixed fee and sent it as payment for goods and service. The past I would have just sent it F&F and paid the fee.
They have changed the fee structure - there was probably an email telling us this, but from the conversations I have had with folks it seems they were as surprised as I was about the change.
A good robust conversation - but perhaps there are two conversations in this thread somehow merge into one. 1.) A change in fee structure for International Payments and 2.) A problem with people sending money to pay for goods F&F locally instead of as a commercial transaction.