I think Scalextric may under rate them to be "safe" - but that may be the case with most of the manufacture's "stock" motors?
Just looking at the "test" info on
http://slotcarnews.blogspot.com/2007/02 ... -list.html shows:
Scalextric standard “black stripeâ€, Sport (FC-130) 18,000 RPM/12v; tested
20,577-22,300 RPM/12v
tested 99-104 gcm/12v, tested 5.3W/12v
Revell-Monogram standard (FC-130) tested
20,800-24,579/12v
Pioneer Typhoon Mk II QS (FC-130) 18,000 RPM/12v, tested
20,194 RPM/12v
tested 160 gcm/12v, tested 8.1W/12v
Fly standard “black stripe, white endbell†(FC-130) 18,000 RPM/12v, tested
20,408-21,159 RPM/12v
est. 75-100 gcm/12v, est. 5W/12vFly "black endbell" (FC-130) tested
21,450-21,753 RPM/12v
I will say that I have gotten a couple of those motors as replacements and they were no faster than what came in the Scalextric cars originally based on lap times...
:)